|
Post by Seven on Nov 2, 2007 23:24:17 GMT -5
do you have any ideas what the numbers might be? i already tried10, 50, 51, 79, 78, 201.
|
|
|
Post by Seven on Nov 2, 2007 23:26:14 GMT -5
i just tried all the 30's. this mihgt go faster if we took it 10 numbers at a time. you wanna try all the 50's? i'll take 40's.
|
|
|
Post by The Imfamous AKA on Nov 2, 2007 23:26:34 GMT -5
Criz thought is might be 1867, but that's not likely. We might want to try any combo of those.
|
|
|
Post by Seven on Nov 2, 2007 23:28:29 GMT -5
alright. i'll give a few a try.
|
|
|
Post by Seven on Nov 2, 2007 23:35:02 GMT -5
none of them are working -_-. maybe we should just let the don do this.
|
|
|
Post by The Imfamous AKA on Nov 2, 2007 23:36:55 GMT -5
Probably.
|
|
|
Post by Seven on Nov 2, 2007 23:39:02 GMT -5
well, if all else fails, we could use this board as a temporary substitute....
|
|
|
Post by The Imfamous AKA on Nov 2, 2007 23:45:29 GMT -5
Quite.
|
|
|
Post by Seven on Nov 2, 2007 23:46:12 GMT -5
damnit! i can't help it now! i want to know what goddamn number it was!
|
|
|
Post by The Imfamous AKA on Nov 2, 2007 23:50:13 GMT -5
NO! BAD! WE DO THAT OUTSIDE!
|
|
|
Post by Seven on Nov 2, 2007 23:52:23 GMT -5
....i have to make a new thread for this, cuz....
|
|
|
Post by The Imfamous AKA on Nov 2, 2007 23:53:08 GMT -5
Cuz what?
|
|
|
Post by Seven on Nov 2, 2007 23:55:27 GMT -5
cuz, look at the threads and you'll know.
|
|
|
Post by The Imfamous AKA on Nov 2, 2007 23:58:23 GMT -5
We dominated?
|
|
|
Post by Seven on Nov 2, 2007 23:59:55 GMT -5
no, i dominated. and none of those damn numbers where correct damnit!!!
|
|